Hiring a fully reliable and drug-free employee is virtually impossible without the right employee drug testing information. While this may seem impersonal, it, nevertheless, is a truth amongst employers and business professionals. They want the best for their employees and company management profile and all drug abuse or on-the-job intoxication must be handled before this will become a problem.
Importance of employee drug testing
Many business owners choose to perform drug testing on an applicant at the beginning of the hiring process. Others choose to add random employee drug testing throughout the year on regular employees to deter drug use and to create a clean working environment. Sometimes, this choice is obligatory, especially amongst government industries or dangerous, physical labor jobs.
Employers have a strong responsibility towards his or her employees. This includes protecting the innocent from the behavior and dangers of those who arrive on the job intoxicated or under the influence of drugs. After all, on average, 77% of illicit drug users are employed today!
Lawfully, an employer is able to create random drug testing programs to make sure that there are no drug-related accidents. Sometimes, drug abusers are thankful that they have made drug test at work and can finally get the detox help and counseling as they in need to start a new and more positive life.
Employee drug testing solutions
Xlar.com offers urine, oral fluid and hair employee drug testing solutions to meet all your drug test needs. Feel free to order any type of drug test for your specific needs at Xlar.com. Instant employee drug test has never been easier or more reliable.
Make your workplace drug-free with employee drug testing
More and more schools and workplaces are instituting drug tests in order to make sure that the people in the collective are not taking drugs. The question that a lot of people ask is whether the employee drug testing or school drug testing has any major effect. While the people who are caught when using drugs are denied either their jobs or their school activities, it seems like in most cases the number of people who are taking drugs are actually increasing instead of decreasing.
Why to perform employee drug test?
- Reduce absenteeism, tardiness, sick leave and personal time off.
- Reduce employee discipline problems.
- Increase productivity in your company.
- Improve employee's morale and motivation.
- Improve image of your company.
The subject of employee drug testing is one of the most disputable questions. Some claim that it is incredibly necessary for a productive and safe working environment, while others argue that random employee drug test violates personal privacy laws. However, no matter what side you are on, the need to create a healthier work environment is growing at a fantastic rate.
More and more companies are realizing the damaging effects that drugs can have on the workplace, and how employee drug testing can discourage use and encourage higher productivity and health amongst employees.
Insure health – order employee drug test as a preventative measure today!
Trauma patients whose conditions resulted from alcohol or drug use could prevent future visits to the emergency room (ER). In 38 states and the District of Columbia, however, doctors often do not test for alcohol and drug use because of laws that allow insurers to refuse to pay medical costs, which can run into thousands of dollars, if the client was under the influence of alcohol or narcotics. According to an article in The Wall Street Journal (February 26, 2003), these "decades-old" laws discourage trauma and emergency room doctors from doing routine blood alcohol tests or 'tox screens' on suspect patients because the hospital and doctor may not get paid if the insurer decides to deny coverage.
Removing these laws from the books and encouraging doctors to counsel trauma patients who are intoxicated can actually prevent these patients from incurring alcohol-related injuries in the future. Dr. Gentilello completed a three-year, federally-funded study of over 700 Seattle trauma patients with alcohol-related injuries. The study was published in the Annals of Surgery in 1999. His study showed that "the patient group that received 30 minutes of counseling at the hospital experienced a 47% reduction in serious injuries requiring trauma-center admission in the following three years, plus a 48% reduction in less-serious injuries requiring ER care." Dr. Gentilello says that counseling trauma patients with substance abuse problems could save billions of dollars in health care costs each year. Substance abuse is the root cause of up to half of all trauma-center visits.
Insurers contend that the costs of claims would rise if they have to cover all the injuries of people under the influence of drugs or alcohol. In addition, the Health Insurers Association of America, a trade group, says that "doctors who won't order tests and counseling for alcoholics and drug abusers because of financial concerns are guilty of a 'shocking abdication of responsibility.'" Although Maryland, North Carolina, and Vermont have repealed these inhibiting laws, the legislatures of New York, Arizona, and, interestingly, Washington (the site of Dr. Gentilello's study) have failed to do so.
Drug Testing in United Kingdom
Almost 20 years ago passed after drug testing procedure bacame usual as pre-employment or post-accidental on U.S. workplaces, it is still relatively unusual in the U.K.
A new report from an independent British commission suggests it should stay that way. The Independent Inquiry Into Drug Testing in the Workplace, a project funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and assisted by the think tank DrugScope, did 18 months of research, including surveys, reviews of the scientific literature, and input from experts, employers, and drug test providers. Its report, available at www.jrf.org.uk, concludes that "the evidence does not provide much support for alarmist claims about the impact of drug use on absenteeism, turnover, productivity or reputation.
Nor has it been demonstrated that drug testing has a significant deterrent effect." Even in safety-sensitive jobs, the commissioners recommend direct measurement of impairment, where feasible, rather than tests that detect traces of drugs long after their effects have worn off. "While it can have a useful role in some industries," they conclude, drug testing "is no substitute for good management practice." |
